highly specialized regime, a heavy dependency on water-born minerals for nutrition, a
reliance on man-made water works and a stable equilibrium...” (1963: 36-37).
Since the Neolithic era, extensive areas of forest land have been farmed every year
under conditions of shifting cultivation. Today the total areas of shifting cultivation
have been estimated to be fourteen million square miles inhabited by two hundred
million people worldwide (FAO staff 1959:9 as cited in Conklin, 1961). In the eastern
Himalayan region, shifting cultivation is the most prominent farming system
providing a way of life for large numbers of ethnic-group minorities and other poor
and marginalized communities (Kerchoff and Sharma, 2006).
“...It is recognized that shifting cultivation is the key to livelihoods of many ethnic,
indigenous and tribal groups in the tropical and subtropical highland of Asia, Africa
as well as Latin America. It is one of the most complex and multifaceted form of
traditional agro forestry in the world reflecting robust traditional ecological
knowledge. It has evolved as a traditional practice and is an institutionalized resource
management mechanism ensuring ecological security and food security thus
providing a social safety net for local communities...” (Anderson, et al., 2007:5).
1.1 Statement of Research Problem
Shifting cultivation is a locally determined and well defined pattern (Gurung, 1999). It
is also the traditional mode of adaptation to the local cultural, environmental situation
(Ibid). “Anthropologists very often relate shifting cultivation to types or stages of
human culture. They point out that most shifting cultivators use primitive tools that
they belongs to culture that are otherwise primitive in a number of ways. Some view it
more as an ancient practice rooted in history, than a contemporary means of coping
with the need to produce food” (Found 1987:17-18).
However, Dhakal (2000) says that the understanding and explanation of shifting
cultivation is understood as the primitive, elementary, and earliest stage of
agricultural evolution, which is surpassed by the permanent cultivation is inadequate.
It is an integral part of socio-cultural practices of a particular community and its
rationale and meanings are inseparably interwoven with the cultural and social
practices. Furthermore, the studies suggests (presented by Lansing: 1991, Spencer:
1996, and Conklin: 1961 as cited in Dhakal, 2000: 105-6) shifting cultivation is not
0 comments:
Post a Comment